Restored Petition on CitizenGO (a conservative platform) after Change.org leftists banned ours
Sign now to save believers from major assaults
The radical leftist platform change.org banned our petition. Thanks so much for those who signed this protection for believers. However it's urgent if you could sign it again now on the Conservative platform CitizenGO, this one is Christian / Pro life etc and won't take it down. https://citizengo.org/en-us/208581-vote-no-same-sex-marriage-bill-and-any-new-bills-re-define-holy-matrimony The criminals seek new ways to assault Christians everywhere under this new "Same Sex Marriage Bill". We were starting to get traction on our petition as we met the first few goals. Then suddenly change.org removed our petition as now being in their "community standards". I actually was appauled the kind of community standards they have there. Mainly if it doesn't promote LGBTQ and promote other abominable sins against Nature and the Creator then it will be against their rules of operating.
However Thanks and Praise be to God that He has preserved a Christian conservative Pro-Life Petition organization called CitizenGO. I've relaunched the petition now over there. It's going to get announced to our 5,000 subscribers in coming hours. I'd appreciate as many as possible who signed before, can sign again on this new petition.
It is easy to sign and pass to more friends: https://citizengo.org/en-us/208581-vote-no-same-sex-marriage-bill-and-any-new-bills-re-define-holy-matrimony
As you may know the new radical "Same Sex Marriage Bill" is trying to work it's way through the Senate. It already passed in the house, and this is a great danger of assault on Christians everywhere.
We were starting to get traction on our petition as we met the first few goals. Then suddenly change.org removed our petition as now being in their "community standards". I actually was appauled the kind of community standards they have there. Mainly if it doesn't promote LGBTQ and promote other abominable sins against Nature and the Creator then it will be against their rules of operating.
However Thanks and Praise be to God that He has preserved a Christian conservative Pro-Life Petition organization called CitizenGO. I've relaunched the petition now over there. It's going to get announced to our 5,000 subscribers in coming hours. I'd appreciate as many as possible who signed before, can sign again on this new petition.
It is easy to sign and pass to more friends: https://citizengo.org/en-us/208581-vote-no-same-sex-marriage-bill-and-any-new-bills-re-define-holy-matrimony
Please go to the link and read the reasons why this is so important.
Reminder:
Under the 1st Amendment there really are NO LIMITS (no abridging) on how we may Petition the Congress:
The First Amendment
Reads as follows:
Congress [the federal government (added for emphasis)] shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Isolating the right of petition for the redress of grievances out of the First Amendment reads as follows:
"Congress [the federal government (added for emphasis)] shall make no law… abridging the… right of the people… to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Abridge Definition:
1. to shorten by omissions while retaining the basic contents:
a. to abridge a reference book.
2. to reduce or lessen in duration, scope, authority, etc.; diminish; curtail:
a. to abridge a visit;
b. to abridge one's freedom.
3. to deprive; cut off.
Supporting the Constitution
The First Amendment when ratified in 1791 only applied to the federal government; however, in 1868 the U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1 applied these rights or privileges and immunities within the Constitution to State and local governments stating:
“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;”
There is no caveat or exception for this restriction on government even when a State exercises “Emergency Powers.” No law, not even State emergency powers can supersede the Constitution for the United States in accordance with the Constitution Article VI Section 2:
“This constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land.”
More info to be added…
Consequences of failing to support the Constitution
Any public servant who denies any U.S. Citizen these rights, privileges, or immunities has violated their oath of office in accordance with Section 3 of the 14th Amendment which states:
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or Elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State Legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
What this means in plain English is that any public servants except for the President of the United States or Vice President, having taken their legal oath to office and then either directly violates the Constitution (i.e. committing rebellion against the Constitution), or does not arrest those who are violating the Constitution (regardless of their public service level) because their oath requires them to “support” the Constitution, or gives aid and comfort to those committing rebellion against the Constitution is no longer eligible to hold office. Due to this failure to be eligible, they must be removed immediately – no due process because this is not a criminal proceeding where the public servant is sent to jail, simply a removal from office due to ineligibility.
This is not to imply that criminal charges cannot be brought forward to seek justice for the damages done by public servants, the point in fact is that criminal charges and a trial are a completely separate process – that will afford the removed public servant due process because due process is guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution stating:
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.”
This also applies to the States in accordance with the Fourteenth Amendment, which states:
“nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
To be clear, removing a public servant from office as a consequence for violating their oath of office does not deprive them of their life, property, or liberty for a crime. The depravation process of taking a person’s life, liberty, or property specifically refers to the legal process of being charged, tried, can convicted of a crime without having a common law trial by jury as guaranteed in the Sixth and Seventh Amendment which states:
Sixth “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”
Seventh “In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”
What you need to know about the Right of Petition for the Redress of Grievances
No government at any level can abridge your right of petition… the Constitution needs amending before they can even consider abridging this right.
Understanding that they cannot abridge your right of petition, they cannot:
1. Create a duration, length, or time limit to your Petition
2. Restrict your style or format of your petition
3. Dictate how or who can deliver a petition other than you must be a U.S. Citizens of 17 years of age
a. You do not have to be a resident of the State or vicinity to petition government regarding their compliance to the Constitution
4. Constrain or restrict in anyway your gathering of signatures for you petition
a. They cannot require a person petitioning or signing a petition be a registered voter, this right is extended to ALL U.S. Citizens 17 Years of age
b. They cannot create time constraints on the gathering of signatures
5. As a public servant in a Republican Form of government tell you to petition someone else, they are legally obligated to support the Constitution
Who can generate a Petition for the redress of grievances?
Any U.S. citizen 17 years of age
Why 17 years of age?
The minimum federal age limit for a U.S. citizen (any gender) to serve and that can be compelled to serve their State and National government is the age of 17.
Who should be the primary target for all petitions?
Your local legislators and public servants
How to write effective Petitions
The point of a petition is to hold our public servants and government accountable to the Constitution. Remember they take an oath to support the Constitution and once we vigorously demand their compliance we will begin to see significant changes to where our liberties will be restored and the cost of government will go down.
In essence, you need to create a Constitutional and legal argument that what your government or public servants are doing wrong is a violation of the Constitution. The following is provided as a generic sample of the flow of a Petition:
1. Start off with the date as to when the public servant took their legal oath
2. Provide detail as to what their “support” must entail as our elected public servants (see above summation on support)
3. Then spell out the law as to what they must do or what they cannot do and reference the Constitutional role, responsibility, powers, or property that has been delegated or what requirement rights, privileges, or immunities are being violated
4. Then spell out what and how the public servants or government has violated the Constitution
5. Provide historical context as to what has or has not happened in the past
6. Then spell out the consequences of violating ones oath of office, failing to support the Constitution, or giving aid and comfort to those violating the Constitution and how ALL public servants who fail to support the Constitution are no longer eligible to be a public servant (see above Consequences of failing to support the Constitution)
7. Then provide the direction as to what the petitioned must do and how and what should be done and or who should do it at the next level of government up
In Conclusion
The above may be the most effective approach, involving County level and petitioning them to petition the state legislature and up the chain. However, we have other tools at our disposal which doesn't require us to go door-to-door gathering signatures. CitizenGO gives us a way to get the signatures more effectively and it also has options to alert those who it concerns (like the Senate Leadership) when it reaches a certain number of signatures etc. I will wait till after 1,000 signatures probably. So here's our shortcut for the time we have. The leftists abuse this right of petition, we keep civil and comprehensive. Please sign it as soon as you get the chance: https://citizengo.org/en-us/208581-vote-no-same-sex-marriage-bill-and-any-new-bills-re-define-holy-matrimony
Other educational information like the ORGANIC Tree of Liberty etc is sent to those who inquire. Preview of ORGANIC Tree of Liberty is attached.
Kind regards and God Bless
Rev Dr Stephen MK Brunswick