URGENT "Candidate Questionnaires" on Vital Topics, for Patriots
to be implemented at all political orgs
Dear Friend,
We at Priory of Salem, Institute of Peace Studies have uncovered massive issues that are not "fence sitting" items.
Many politicians have not let their stance be known on key topics.
We encourage you to work with us or help formulate a better candidate questionnaire to your network.
Perhaps together we can at least co-endorse a version of it and get our endorsements out to our subscribers.
Voter Guides are TOTALLY protected speech for any organization, and they do not need to re-register as a political action type group.
Our private school attached to our church are well within our capacity to help publish this together with your help.
We also give you permission to edit your own version and make a questionnaire on your own website. No questions asked.
Please find our own version attached, as is being circulated to candidates at all levels in Alabama and other states.
great info from page https://cc.org/church-liaison/ (same for ANY non-profits)
DOs and DON’Ts for Church Political Activity
What Churches May Do:
Conduct non-partisan voter registration drives
Distribute non-partisan voter education materials, such as Christian Coalition voter guides and scorecards
Host forums where all viable candidates are allowed to speak
Allow candidates and elected officials to speak at church services
Educate members about pending legislation
Lobby for legislation and may spend an insubstantial amount of its budget (5% is safe) on direct lobbying activities
Pastors (and members) may endorse candidates in their capacity as private citizens
Participate fully in political committees that are independent of the church
What Churches May NOT Do:
Endorse candidates directly or indirectly on behalf of the church
Contribute funds or services (such as mailing lists or office equipment) directly to candidates or political committees
Distribute materials that clearly favor any candidate or party
Pay fees for partisan political events from church funds
Allow candidates to solicit funds while speaking in church
Set up a political committee that would contribute to candidates
Kind regards and God Bless
Priory of Salem, Institute of Peace Studies
Telephone
(866) 477-6811
Candidate Questionnaire Priory of Salem, Institute of Peace Studies - 2024
Peace Without Forced Blasphemy Against the Creator
Alabama Office, St Andrew’s O.C.C.
We’re calling on Politicians to answer key questions so we may know their stance. The public needs to know whether they choose to:
REPEL THE COMMUNIST INVASION AND RESTORE THE REPUBLIC(S),
OR
RESTORE REGIONAL MICRO-CONFEDERACIES BETWEEN THE STATE REPUBLIC(S), TO RIVAL THE DEEP INFILTRATION
OR
TO CONTINUE WAGING INSURRECTION AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN LEAGUE WITH THE HOSTILE ENEMY EMPIRE CALLED GLOBALISM. TO CONTINUE USURPING AND STEALING OUR SOVEREIGN RIGHTS, ESPECIALLY THE RIGHTS OF LIFE, LIBERTY AND PROPERTY AS DEFINED BY OUR CREATOR.
KEY QUESTIONS
STOP Federal Mandates from the WHO (CCP) Pandemic Treaty?
Yes ___
No ___
As Treaties are the law of the land, do you agree your State should lose it’s Sovereignty and your Citizens should be discriminated against on basis of their race under the WHO (CCP) Pandemic Treaty? The treaty requires “global equitable” redistribution of all resources to developing countries far away, in order to prevent another pandemenic.
Should we wait for this overreach to get challenged and overturned in court, even if it takes 50 years? Or do we need secession?
STOP Vaccine Passports of the Chinese Communist Party?
Yes ___
No ___
Although Biden failed to fully implement it, vaccine passports are planned for the future under the Pandemic Treaty. This is a way to go around the US Supreme Court which said they can’t deny employment based on new using medicines. However, even if America left the pandemic treaty it still looks like the policies will be done.
Do you believe American’s rights can be overriden if they don’t follow a CCP like vaccine passport sheme?
STOP 2030 30-30 Policy Land Grabs and 50-50 Plan
Yes ___
No ___
The Federal Government has clearly declared it’s policies are to take 30% of the land from private ownership by 2030, as is happening in Europe by other Governments who pledged the same, stripping farmlands away from the owners. It also pledges to take 50% by 2050 and ban nearly all agriculture, food is to be grown in labs, and the lands are to be used for alternative energy, and ensuring that “climate refugees” have enough places to stay.
Although “life, liberty and property” are considered fundamental rights, there are literally hundreds of programs right carefully disguised and funded directly to municipalities, outside of State knowledge, and often funded directly by UN programs.
Should the state begin prosecuting all of the foreign co-conspirators under these foreign programs, or is secession the only viable solution?
Constitutional Amendment to Formalize State’s rights of Nullification?
Yes ___
No ___
Under the 10th Amendment many state laws nullified Federal mandates and overreach. However, even today the state laws of Texas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama and others are being directly sued by the US Attorney General under radical liberal mis-interpretations of the Constitution and the Federal powers. These lawsuits take much time and cost to the taxpayer when their best representatives could be better serving their state. Therefore this process harms the citizens in what’s supposed to be their guaranteed Republican form of government (the local elected representive government).
Often, like in this year’s decision against Texas’ use of razor wire, the Supreme Court decides against the state laws. Sometimes, the federal overreach takes 49 years to fix in court, such as in the Roe v Wade overturn.
Should the states move to make a new Constitution Amendment, or is secesion the only solution?
Audit All Laws Based on Glucksberg Test
Yes ___
No ___
The “Glucksberg test” has been used as the deciding factor on whether a State law could be overridden based on a Federal mandate. This has often taken 50 years to finally get its day in court.
In the USSC McDonald v Chicago 2nd Amendment Case, it was confirmed that even for the US Bill of Rights, these could not be forced upon the states via the 14th Amendment.
It was concluded that the only reason the 2nd Amendment could be forced onto States was via the Glucksberg test, as having proven to be “deeply rooted in the history and traditions of the people”. In this case, it only applied to states because the wording “keep and bear arms” was part of the preceding English Bill of Rights of 1689.
The Glucksberg rule also exempted states from having to violate state laws that had previously banned abortion, same sex marriage, interracial marriage, and other previously known laws.
Should the State wait for Glucksberg Tests to reach the Supreme Court, or move for secession?
Protect anti-Christian practices that limit Christian speech disproportionately, although such practices are “not deeply rooted in the history and traditions”?
Yes ___
No ___
Although other false religions are not “deeply rooted” in the traditions of the people, presently, the federal mis-use of the 1st Amendment is used to elevate false religions, and even forcing our children to watch sadistic pornography in schools. The Mayflower Compact demonstrates a set of Christian beliefs “deeply rooted in the history and traditions” as a group trying to escape secular humanistic encroachments on the Christian religion itself.
America’s First Constitution of 1637 clearly stated the settlers had “one aim: the advancement of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ, and maintaining the purity of the Gospel”, this was later ratified in all New England colony states and continued, at least in today’s constitution as the basis of the union that was still being perfected.
Art. 1, s. 1 of the US Constitution lays this down most plainly: “the power is in the People who are represented by the independent States”
Art. 6, s. 1 of the US Constitution binds the definition of the People and their common law duties as:“…engagements entered into before the adoption of the Constitution, shall be valid..”.
Part of this body of the common law “engagements entered into” would be Federalist Papers #78,“the power of the People is above both (the legislative and judicial branches)”. This is echoed throughout all the Courts of the USA as the most foundational definition of the American “rule of law”.
(Sources: https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/text-41-50 or USCOURTS.GOV (screenshot below, as of 3/6/2023): The most simplistic, precise and conclusive text on “The Rule of Law at USCOURTS.GOV“.
Although the constitution says at a Federal level they wouldn’t be required to have a religious test, many states continued to use such tests for office. Also till the 1950s the law for Naturalization explicitly said you must be Christian to be Naturalized as a Citizen of any state in the union.
Should we wait 50 years for it to get fixed like in Roe v Wade? Some say only secession is the solution. Or is this the way forward, promoting a full audit on basis of the Glucksberg Test?
STOP Federal overreach against Supreme Court Decisions?
Yes ___
No ___
Presently we see a new paradigm, where Congressmen and even the members of the US President’s cabinet openly promote death threats against the Supreme Court by armed anarchists entering into Supreme Court Justice's homes. Open rebellion has been the policy of Biden whenever they made Constitutional opinions he disagrees with, and these threats have only increased.
In addition to the pledged violence, Biden pledges to make the unconstitutional abortion opinion in Roe v Wade to be forced for all States, overriding State laws. This would require states to kill full term babies on any last-moment whim of an intoxicated or distraught mother, or via other pressures. Such mob rule has nearly anything possible.
Do you support these wreckless threats against the Supreme Court?
Freedom of religion can be any new belief that has no history?
Yes ___
No ___
Since the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", some have recently appropriated this to include the state to promote worshipping false gods such as found in religions of Islam, Wicca, or satanism.
These do not pass the Glucksberg test, and in 50 years they will eventually have to be repaired by the federal system. Should we wait 50 years, or do secession now?
Prosecute Doctors and Conspirators for Child Castration crimes
Yes ___
No ___
Currently operating in under vast CCP WHO and overseas financed attacks to recruit atheists to advance their ideology agianst the Creator and his version of “life and liberty”.
The CCP WHO Global Domination moutpiece has installed several programs through propaganda to say they would reduce suicides, when the same report data showed the opposite (also debunked by Sean Hannity etc). See Currently the main tactic has been to manipuate and coerce children into sexual mutiliation, secual stripper dances, and as in California legalized sex trafficing / prostitution. Various schemes would fall under the glucksberg test for prosecution, including all programs (felony conspiracy racketeering) coercion and rape (falsely called transgender) crimes against minors.
Published online 2021 Apr 28. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0952
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082431/#soi210020r19
The report calls itself “a secondary analysis” of the now infamous 2015 US Transgender Survey (on surgeries and mental health outcome) that some ran together with the CCP's World Health Organization misleading reports like WHO/HIV/2014.21. These were circulated by all the media elite and medical elite through Obama’s network he created with the Trillions in Bank Bailouts to the Medical establishment. The original data was fraudulently manipulated to say something it did not, under a military edict from China Against the West (CCP owns the W.H.O. from which this came through). This was consistently in line with the continued "unrestricted warfare tactics" laid out by several top CCP Generals about their war against the west. The West's institutions fell like dominos to their strategy.
Protect Displays of the Ten Commandments
Yes ___
No ___
Judge Roy Moore battled the removal of the Ten Commandments for 30 years, primarily against Federal misconduct. The Ten Commandments normally would have promoted these to be in the courts, as “deeply rooted in the history and traditions”.
Should the Ten Commandments be displayed publicly on Government property and buildings such as courthouses and schools?
Protect History and heritage
Yes ___
No ___
Do you support the display of the Christian symbol known as St. Andrew's Cross as implemented in the Confederate Battle Flag alongside State flags being flown on government property?
Do you support the Alabama Memorial Preservation Act? (equivelant of local law)
End Taxes
Yes ___
No ___
Are you willing to sign a "No Tax Pledge"?
Have you ever supported any tax increases?
Do you agree that the ability to confiscate real estate based on the failure to pay property taxes means that the government actually owns all land and not private citizens?
Protect Gun Rights
Yes ___
No ___
Do you favor unrestricted 2nd Amendment Rights, including the Constitutional Right to carry a concealed gun without a gun permit?
In case of national emergency, hurricane disaster, or martial law, do your support the federal, state, or local government being able to remove or confiscate guns from citizens?
Do you support the government being able to confiscate guns for “mental health?”
Do you support the ability for a judge to confiscate guns from divorced or separated fathers based on a wife’s fear for the safety of their children?
Should federal gun laws be nullified since they violate the 2nd amendment?
Should it be legal to carry a gun in any public place such as businesses open to the public (stores or restaurants), churches, schools, or government buildings?
Should judges refuse to convict any citizen guilty of a gun law in violation of the 2nd amendment? Should law enforcement officers refuse to arrest any citizen who violates such a law? Should prosecutors refuse to prosecute any citizen for such a law? Should the legislature and governor nullify federal laws and court rulings or orders on guns which violate the 2nd amendment?
Protect the Original Education system?
Yes ___
No ___
Should there be public prayer and Bible reading in government schools?
Do you support the implementation of federal Common Core Standards (also known as College and Career Ready Standards) in Alabama classrooms?
Do you support the reading of Common Core smut books, like "The Bluest Eye," and "Dreaming in Cuban," and the use of books that teach socialism in Alabama Public Schools like "A People's History of the United States," by Howard Zinn?
Is evolution false and contrary to the Word of God and should the truth of Creation by the Christian God in six literal 24 hour days approximately 6,000 years ago as recorded in Genesis be taught as fact in public schools?
Should the public education system be allowed to teach in support of things which are contrary to God's Word such as homosexuality, abortion, pre-marital sex, birth control, atheism, evolution, Islam, liberalism, socialism, communism, and government welfare?
Do you support any restrictions, regulations, or taxation on private Christian or homeschool education beyond what Alabama or federal law currently has?
Do you support school vouchers to enable parents to choose their school of choice, public or private?
If Child Protective Services was removing children from a home based on that family's homeschooling or refusal to vaccinate, would you defend that family from the kidnapping and resist the tyranny of that agent?
Protect State Constitution
Yes ___
No ___
26. Do you support or oppose the rewrite of the Alabama Constitution?
27. Do you support or oppose the Convention of States Project or an Article V Constitutional Convention?
28. Do you pledge to uphold and defend the Alabama Constitution?
29. Have you read the U.S. Constitution, and will you uphold and support a strict originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution?
Protect God’s Definition of Marriage
Yes ___
No ___
30. Is the definition of marriage only between a man and a woman?
31. Should the state sanction sodomy which God declares to be an abomination (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13; Judges 19:22; Romans 1:26-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 1:10) by granting sodomites or lesbians fictional marriage licenses?
32. Do you support anti-discrimination laws based on sexual orientation?
33. Should sodomites or lesbians be able to adopt children?
34. Should probate judges refuse to grant marriage licenses to sodomites or lesbians regardless of a court ruling or order, or state or federal law?
35. Should the legislature and governor nullify Obergefell v. Hodges?
36. Do you support overturning Lawrence v. Texas?
STOP Obamacare Schemes
Yes ___
No ___
37. Do you support the repeal of Obamacare?
38. Do you support any state or federal expansion of medicaid/medicare?
States’ Rights
Yes ___
No ___
39. Do you support the right of a state to assert their 10th Amendment rights through nullification?
Immigration
Yes ___
No ___
40. Will you support legislation to restrict illegal immigration?
41. Do you support repealing the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965?
42. Do you support guarding the southern border of the U.S. with the national guard until the border wall is completed?
43. Do you support using the national guard to aid in deporting illegal aliens?
44. Should we ban the immigration of Muslims as original proposed by President Trump during the campaign?
Protect Privacy
Yes ___
No ___
45. Should the government at any level or agency or department be spying on and collecting any electronic records or communication such as the metadata of phone calls, recording of phone calls, tracking of cell phone user locations, text messages, email, and social network (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) usage or comments without a specific court order?
Protect Free Speech
Yes ___
No ___
46. Do you believe that large social networking websites such as Facebook and Twitter are natural monopolies and function as a defacto public square and that 1st amendment rights must be enforced on those platforms?
Protect Powers of Lawfully (Constitutional) Elected Judges
47. Do you support or oppose powers of lawful Judges (constitutional/elected) Judges?
48. Do you support restoring the proper check on the judicial branch as originally intended by the framers of the U.S. Constitution?
49. Do you support reforming the Judicial Inquiry Commission and only allowing judges to be removed by a vote in the legislative branch?
50. Was Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Judge Roy Moore right in his actions in 2003 and in 2015-2016?
Any comments on the above questions?
Please answer the following questions with a brief answer and include any additional explanation you deem necessary.
51. Who are the other candidates in the race, Democrat and Republican?
Explain why you are the better candidate.
52. What are the 3 most important issues in your campaign, and your position on them?
a.
b.
c.
53. Are you born again?
Please state your personal relationship with God.
54. Do you believe the Bible is divinely inspired and without error and is to be the ultimate authority for all of life?
53. Of what local church are you a member in good standing and regular attendance?
54. Would you submit to church discipline if you were found to be ruling, governing, or acting contrary to the Word of God or had committed a seriously immoral act while in office?
55. Romans 13 says that civil authorities are ordained by God as His servants in order to punish evil-doers and serve those doing good. Ultimately, what standard of morality must be enforced and what standard of evil must be punished?
56. What should be the ultimate source, standard, and basis of all laws or court rulings?
57. If a law of man contradicts the law of God, which law should be upheld regardless of consequences?
58. If a higher authority ordered you to do something which was either 1. a violation of the state or U.S. Constitution, 2. a violation of the Law of God, what would be your response?